Electoral Bonds
R Venkataramani
CJI DY Chandrchud
Harish Salve
Kapil Sibal
Tushar Mehta
Finance
Prashant Bhushan
This Video is Strictly for LEGAL AWARENESS & EDUCATION Purpose only
The Supreme Court’s 9-judge Constitution Bench initiated hearings on February 27 to address complex issues related to the taxation of mineral-bearing lands, focusing primarily on the characterization of royalty under Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR Act) as a tax. The first day saw discussions on important considerations for the hearing and the interpretation of constitutional provisions concerning tax legislation powers allocated between the central and state governments.
The bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, includes Justices Hrishikesh Roy, Abhay Oka, BV Nagarathna, JB Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, Ujjal Bhuyan, SC Sharma, and AG Masih, addressing petitions against the Bihar Coal Mining Area Development Authority (Amendment) Act, 1992, and related regulations, which implemented additional cess and taxes on revenues from mineral-rich lands.
These issues were escalated to the 9-judge bench in 2011 following a three-judge bench’s framing of eleven critical tax law questions, including whether ‘royalty’ can be equated with tax and if the state legislature can base tax on land value on the land’s production.
A Senior Advocate, representing Jharkhand, posed five key inquiries for the bench’s consideration. These questions delved into the essence of royalty as defined in the MMDR Act, its classification as a tax, and the scope and limitations of constitutional entries that govern the central and state power distribution over taxation.
During the discussions, a Senior Advocate highlighted an ambiguity in paragraph 34 of the Kesoram Industries case judgment, which suggested conflicting views on whether royalty is considered a tax. This ambiguity spurred a conversation about the need for clarification on this matter, considering the direct implications on how royalties and cesses on mineral rights are perceived.
The court explored Entry 50 of the State List in the Constitution, which allows states to tax mineral rights with possible limitations by Parliament. The debates suggested that “limitation” should be understood as a cap on tax powers rather than a transfer of these powers to Parliament, emphasizing a balance between national interest and state autonomy.
The case under discussion, Mineral Area Development v. M/S Steel Authority Of India & Ors (CA N0. 4056/1999), delves into significant matters regarding the distribution of legislative power between the Union and the States, and the specific powers of states to levy taxes on mineral rights, considering the overarching regulatory framework established by Parliament.
MP High Court Live, High Court Live Streaming, Patna High Court Live Stream, Gujarat High Court Live Stream, Madhya Pradesh High Court Live Stream, MP High Court Live, Court Room Live Stream, Court Room, Legal Fact in India , Patna High Court Live Stream Today, Indian High Court live Stream, Justice Jitendra Kumar, Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, Justice Sandeep Kumar, Justice Vivek Agarwal, Justice DY Chandrachud
Important - If you have anything against my uploads or have any suggestions, please contact me at [email protected].
lawyer
attorney
immigration lawyer
lawyers near me
personal injury lawyer
divorce lawyer
car accident lawyer
divorce lawyers
bankruptcy attorney
law firm
barrister
divorce attorney
family law
divorce lawyers near me
solicitor
employment law
real estate attorney
family law attorney
immigration lawyer near me
personal injury attorney
real estate lawyer
injury lawyer
business law
accident lawyer
criminal defense attorney
divorce attorney near me
david boies
attorney at law
bankruptcy lawyer
law office
corporate law
law firms near me
car accident attorney
immigration attorney
tax attorney
workers comp lawyer
bankruptcy lawyers near me
malpractice lawyer
medical malpractice lawyer
employment attorney
family lawyer near me
accident attorney
michael avenatti nike
estate planning attorney
probate lawyer
tax lawyer
injury attorney
medical malpractice attorney
law offices near me
dui lawyer
@lawnowTV
#law #judge #advocate #electoralbonds #money #tax #finance #banking #article370 #politicalnews #maharashtra #maharashtranews #politics #parliament #constitution #lawyer #court #courtlive #argument #legal #ias #ips #police #judiciary #learnlaw #supremecourtofindia #younglawyers #highcourt #bihar #cpc #evidence #biharjudiciary #bpsc #gujaratpolice
Read More
By: Law Now
Title: Intense Debate between CJI and Harish Salve- "This Will Go Against You!", SC Live
Sourced From: www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMFO9YQ68J4
-------------------------------
Did you miss our previous article...
https://trendingintaxation.com/videos/is-trump-flipping-on-social-security-benefits
